|
|
 |
|
| |
Top Boot Politics Sequel III
On January 12 2007
If it takes a thief to know a thief, top military leaders should know best how and why their peers are breaking ranks to become a menace to society rather than a guardian of social peace .
Defence Minister Boonrawd Somtas said it himself that based on evidence and plausible assumption, he suspected men in uniform were involved in the New Year bomb attacks.
On January 8, General Prem Tinsulanonda, president of the Privy Council, met with 84 senior cavalry officers and key battalion commanders and urged them to act as an anchor for public morale and safeguard the country in light of the unstable situation triggered by political turbulence.
"Soldiers must win the people's trust that they are capable of assuring safety and normalcy," he said.
Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont reminded members of the public that they should brace for politically-motivated violent incidents in the next few months.
From the look of things, particularly the crucial meeting between Prem and battalion commanders, I believe that the mid-year military reshuffle in July preceding the September 19 coup was the catalyst for bomb blasts.
Army chief General Sonthi Boonyaratglin outflanked then premier Thaksin Shinawatra by uprooting all of battalion commanders seen as Thaksin's cronies. Sonthi's move undermined the clout of Thaksin's allies from Pre-Cadet Class 10 and paved way for his grip on power.
Maj General S, a Thaksin's Pre-Cadet Class 10 fellow graduate and staunch ally, had personal and professional interest to steer officers from Pre-Cadet Class 22-to-24 to rise through the military ranks. The general and his proteges are now assigned to desk job.
In the July's reshuffle, Sonthi chose to fill key battalion positions with graduates from Pre-Cadet Class 25-to-26. And he removed the majority of Pre-Cadet Class 10 officers to inactive positions after the coup.
Even though there is no one pointing an accusing finger against former battalion commanders, it is not a mere coincidence that Prem should have an unscheduled meeting with incumbent commanders.
Hush talks in the military barracks indicated that bombers might be crack troops from the Northeast. It is another matter, however, whether police could uncover sufficient evidence to merit prosecution.
I suspect the masterminds behind the bombing will never be unmasked because it is a long-established tradition that graduates from the Chulachomklao Royal Military Academy will not annihilate one another.
Based on past incidents, only General Chalard Hiranyasiris was executed by firing after a failed coup against the Kriangsak Chamanan government because he shot dead General Arun Thawathasin, then commander of the First Army Region who opposed the power seizure.
Suspected masterminds in all past bombings linked to the military continue to elude the law to this day.
It should be interesting how Sonthi would rotate his combat commanders in April. It is imperative that Sonthi must realign key Army positions if peace is to return to the capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Other Comment
|
Time for ELECTIONS 07/02/2007 02:21 IP: 84.169.64.126
Hello Ian, how to get rid of the Juanta? It could be done in a cowardly way just like when they took over. Wait until Soothi leaves the country then have officers loyal to the palace and constituion take it back. Then instruct the media not to show his face and erase his name from Thai history. Then charge him and his corrupt CNS with the crimes they commited.
OR the palace can say enough is enough...and set a date for elections. When a new PM is ELECTED then make any actions relating to a planning and executing a coup a capital crime.
|
Delete  |
|
Ian 02/02/2007 09:15 IP: 219.95.181.168
Time for elections, you say, "The palace should intervene, throw the mutineers and coup plotters in jail,". How? The King has charismatic power, but not physical power, who has the physical power to arrest a general? It could only be done with the consent of his staff officers and soldiers.
|
Delete  |
|
Time for Elections! 02/02/2007 02:51 IP: 84.169.48.22
How odd to ask the military to act as an anchor and guardian of the country during this time of political turbulence. It is the military itself who shredded the constitution and deposed a democratically elected PM and his goverment. The military created the "political turbulence". The palace should intervene, throw the mutineers and coup plotters in jail, restore the TRT as a caretaker government and hold ELECTIONS!
|
Delete  |
|
Oscar 17/01/2007 23:36 IP: 124.120.70.222
Ian, hi.
Yep, fully agree.
|
Delete  |
|
Ian 17/01/2007 13:05 IP: 124.121.72.74
Oscar, there is a simple expression that sums up your last comment, it is "tunnel vision". When we look at Thai politics, and the way some people in these blogs throw themselves into crusades, it is clear that tunnel vision is a major component in Thai thinking. Another word which I suspect does not exist in the Thai language is empathy, the ability to put yourself in the other person's shoes. Without empathy one must always blame the other person, the world is "out of step", not oneself:-) This returns to education, the Thai version ignores the big picture but relies instead on rote learning and narrow content, another form of tunnel vision:-) Khunmoon, blaming others for one's misfortunes is of course another aspect of tunnel vision.
|
Delete  |
|
Oscar 17/01/2007 11:57 IP: 58.64.78.73
I think I should clarify my remark about the back-office (unconscious) mode that most Thais seem to spend much of their time in. It occurred to me that I must have made it appear that I think Thais are unpleasant by nature. I dont think this. I think that while in 'back-office' or 'autopilot' mode, they act with such an extraordinary lack of peripheral awareness of events and people, and with such a ferociously self-centred approach that it appears objectionable to most westerners who in the main have a more highly developed sense of social responsibility. Thais have extraordinarily low levels of social responsibility whch accounts for the lawlessness of the country in big ways and small. But I dont think they set out to be unpleasant, I think they simply dont know how to behave in a way which does not appear manifestly unpleasant to western cultures. Remind me to talk about walking and chewing gum sometime... another aspect of the Thai.
|
Delete  |
|
khunmoon 17/01/2007 11:57 IP: 203.146.63.187
I can only agree, Ian. I still call myself a Buddhist for nearly forty years, but it wasn't before I came to Thailand I saw it at work in a society. It was more than a cultural shock. For the first few years I tried to participate in their worshipping, but it became both pathetic and hypocritical. So now I just say, Buddha is something you have in your heart, not in a watt. What Buddhism is, is sound skepticism, not pagant superstition. If not for their Theravada, they would be lost without nowhere to put their blame. About the only thing they got right from Buddha is that everything is interconnected. What they get wrong is they use it to blame anyone for their own misfortune. Not being fully aware, that only you yourself can make the change, I think.
|
Delete  |
|
Ian 17/01/2007 11:07 IP: 124.121.72.115
khunmoon, as I said elsewhere in these blogs, I was surprised when I first came to Thailand at the difference between theoretical Buddhism and what I see practised around me. It seems the fate of all religions to become debased, commercialised and politicised. In Thailand there are more pictures of the King than statues of Buddha, it is clear which is more important to the Thais.
|
Delete  |
|
khunmoon 17/01/2007 10:22 IP: 203.146.63.187
Hi, I'm khunmoon, allow me to jump in. I find what Oscar said about front-office and back-office very appropriate, but considering the divide in egoes and their characteristics one have to be aware they have a basement - as well as a rooftop of course. That's were they take you for sanuk-sanan, kin-kao and whiskey. But it's in the basement floor they do their religion, which as they call it 'buddhism' isn't a religion at all, but a scientific believe system. All their troubles stems from corrupting that believe system into a blatant, self boosting religion.
|
Delete  |
|
Ian 17/01/2007 08:43 IP: 124.121.72.115
Oscar, take cheap labour, it is women who provide it, if it needs a male then he is probably someone from Laos or Myanmar. A Thai man has too high an opinion of himself to work as a menial or labourer, I see the same in Malaysia amongst the Malays, if they cannot get a "status" job they would rather be unemployed.. But it is ok for his woman to work at anything as long as she hands the money over. This is a generalisation, there are decent hard working Thai men who respect their wives and families but I think they are a minority. Thai law is very male orientated, a married woman has very little security, no recouse if the man deserts her or abuses her in any way. So it is a two tier society, farangs don't fit easily into this simple male orientated structure, our culture is more egalitarian. The sex tourist does, so he is quietly encouraged, none of the recent changes in the law affect him, he drops in for a few weeks of hedonistic pleasure and is gone. The decent farang, ecotourist, businessman, retiree is not so welcome, he puts many Thai males in a bad light.
|
Delete  |
|
| Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| |
|
|
Privacy Policy © 2006 www.nationmultimedia.com
44 Moo 10 Bang Na-Trat KM 4.5, Bang Na district, Bangkok 10260 Thailand
Tel 66-2-325-5555, 66-2-317-0420 and 66-2-316-5900 Fax 66-2-751-4446
Contact us: Nation Internet |
|
|
|