Welcome to jeerawat ‘s Blog
 
 
 
 

  What Do you think about Naresuan Part II Movie?

On February 23 2007

 

The Legend of King Naresuan Part II

This is simply the best Thai film I have seen in years. And I must say this is a terrific war movie for it didn't only depict the spectacular battle scenes but also the war strategies and the ambivalence behind it.

In fact, I am not a fan of war movies. And I have to say that I am not impressed with Suriyothai, the epic movie also directed by MC Chatrichalerm Yukol. But King Nasesuan is terrific. It has lots of smart action-packed scenes, light-hearted moments and romances.

First of all, unlike Suriyothai, King Naresuan is a movie that will drive the audience cheer for the lead characters.

Watching Suriyothai is like reading a textbook with tens of characters. But the plots of Naresuan evolve around a few key characters, and the war tactics that Naresuan applied in the process of reclaiming the independence.

The movie is not about the war ifself but the integrity of the warriors and their ambivalence. Monk Khan Shong, played by superb Sorrapong Chatree, was there at the battle scences to remind of the dark side of the war.

Compared to the first one, the sequel is better such as in terms of cast and editing. In the first episode, I have some trouble with actor Sompop Benjathikul playing Hongsa's King Bayinnaung, especially when he lost his cool when meeting with Princess Suphankalaya, Naresuan's older sister. This is despite the fact that I think by letting the three child stars telling the heavy story of the political intrigue has made the first episode more interesting. (It also reminds me of Harry Potter's three lead characters.) The cock-fighting was intense and symbolic. But the battle scene in the first one is no where near Naresuan Part II.   

In part II, the children are grown up to develop their own characters. Boonting, Naresuan's best friend and his army commander, tends to let his emotion out while the Black Prince is more subdued. Boonting's romance with Lekin spiced up the movie, even though historians still cannot confirm if Thais already learned to lock their tongues in 1577. There's not much to say about Maneechan in the second film. 

The Black Prince applied different tactics to win his enemies. The movie depicts him as a strategist who lets Boonting to be the man of action. The characters of these two warriors are also different.

The characters of the other two young lords serve the movie quite well as the sidekicks to bring several light-hearted moments. Their friendship may imply their sexual orientation. But who cares? At least, the various groups of people under Naresuan show his open-minded attitude and the golden days of Ayodhya.

Capt Wanchana Sawasdee, the actor who plays Naresuan is quite a cinematographic presence. He convincingly plays the Warrior King. And his presence makes a big difference between Naresuan and Suriyothai. We all root for him because we could connect with this guy while the actress who plays Suriyothai is robotic.

I got the goosebumps when the Black Prince lifted up the decanter as a symbol to reclaim the sovereignty of Ayodhya. Wanchana pulled it off with conviction. Then, the crowds were cheering "Naresuan" all over. The scene was powerful. It was the first time that we have heard of "Naresuan", the name that most of Thais call Our Warrior King. I am not sure if non-Thai audience would have the strong impression with the scene in the same way as I did.

The cinematography captures the spirit of the movie. One of the early scenes where the Black Prince and the other two Burmese princes were discussing the warfare against the rebellious Khang State reminds me of Rashomon.

The movie didn't only glorify Naresuan but also showed how some, a blind old woman who lost her son to the war, didn't fully agree with his strife for victory. The movie shows that Naresuan is just a human. He couldn't tolerate disobediene. He refused to be sympathised with his sister's decision not to leave Hongsa kingdom and he told his brother his order was the rule.

The battle-scenes where the warriors were trying to outsmart each other were of course the movie's highlights. Here, we saw real people engage in the ancient warfare, while the visions in a number of Hollywood films have obviously gone digital.

Thirty minutes to the end after Naresuan let Boonting take over the action scene, Naresuan came back with the fully heroic act to save all of his subjects, to be the last to cross the bridge over Satong River which was about to fall all over.

And when Naresuan pulled the trigger of that legendary three-metre-long sniper rifle, time stopped. The theatre was silent until the bullet hit the target. Then, the audience couldn't wait any longer to see the final episode.

 

 

   




 
 
Other Comment

Emily  10/04/2007 23:18  IP: 220.235.156.74

Cecil....it's EXTREMELY RUDE of you to insult King Nandabayin (and NOT Nanthabureng as you say) and the Uparaza and his friend. If you don't like the way they look, then....DON'T WATCH THE FILM and FUTURE EPISODES!!!
Delete 

Emily  10/04/2007 21:45  IP: 220.235.156.74

Hi Burmese Man....I 100% agree. Haven't watched the movie yet but I saw Bayintnaung in the trailer with the gold and red long 'hat' as you call it. But King Nandbayin's crown was SO GORGEOUS! It was studded with gems....very impressed with the details...... :D can't wait to watch the movie!! :D...I like the Taungngu/Hanthawaddy period court costumes for Burmese Royalty....it reminds me of all we used to be in the 'golden days'.
Delete 

Giancarlo Galavotti  24/03/2007 19:26  IP: 86.149.165.143

While in Bangkok a couple of weeks ago, I went to see Naresuan Part II. Three hours of computer-enhanced battle scenes are obviuosly what the Thai public seems to find "great". Having seen all versions of Suryiothai, it looks to me as if Naresuan II is basic the same, with the queen replaced by a king. But there is a scene which deserves the Oscar for worst stupid taste, and to me defines the whole movie. I refer to the French kiss between Ekatossarot and princess Lurkhin. He's just freed her from a dungeon where she has rotted for months (years?). But he French kisses her, when such customs where surely foreign to Siam. Not to speak of the imaginable state of her (his) breath. Historical movie? Legend and fiction Hollywood style, but this bit is really the pits.
Delete 

GGrass  07/03/2007 16:51  IP: 203.113.15.234

Final Score <--- A MUST SEE!!!
Delete 

jeerawat  07/03/2007 15:52  IP: 203.154.97.196

Dear Khun KP and everyone, Thank you very much for all of your comments. I am glad that this movie has created an interest in the history and in Thai films. I also recommend you to see another Thai films such as Final Score and of course Kan Kloey (which I couldn't forgive myself for missing this movie in theatre). I hope to have this kind of discussion with you again when the third episode of Naresuan comes in December.
Delete 

KP  05/03/2007 19:35  IP: 203.172.48.249

Dear Jeerawat, Thank you for your comments. I want to say that I loved this movie, too. I don't claim to be a movie critic. It seems that some commentors here were commenting as if they were. I enjoy movies with good themes and characters who are heroic and honorable, and so for me this big epic film was GREAT. In part one, Young Ong Dam was great to watch, and I particularly enjoyed the Abbot at his temple in Hongsawadee. In part two, grown-up Prince Naresuan and Rajamanu were honorable (although R. kissing the enemy girl-warrior annoyed me a bit), and I was happily surprised to see their respective love interests portrayed as brave and loyal. I can't wait to see part 3!
Delete 

GGrass  27/02/2007 14:20  IP: 203.113.15.234

as usual, ian's right. :-) the important thing is, was the movie FUN? :-)
Delete 

Ian  27/02/2007 12:55  IP: 124.121.73.77

I have not seen this film, nor am likely to do so, yet from the comments it would seem it is similar to many western pseudohistorical films like Braveheart, Henry the Fifth, Macbeth, Queen Elisabeth, etc. These are seen as entertainment, a few may debate historical authenticity but if they do it is a seperate isuue from the plot, script, acting and settings. The Thais in this blog seem to be reacting emotionally, both to the film and to each other's comments. I have even read a comment accusing another of criticising the King's family! What a lot of hot air over a piece of "poetic licence", get real folks, it seems you are more worried about films and what clothes a teenage student wears than about the mess your country is in:-)
Delete 

GGrass  27/02/2007 11:32  IP: 203.113.15.234

and when you think about it, the reason for this 'propaganda-like' movie is for hi-so snobs to walk taller and hold their noses higher. all thru out the movie, it's about the king and the nobles doing this and doing that, looking all 'patriotic' and stuff. the real 'patriots' are the foot soldiers who died for their generals. as for the generals, they're just trying to keep their family fortunes.
Delete 

Devine Providence  26/02/2007 17:04  IP: 124.120.226.75

A movie is a movie, they have never claimed to be a documentary. Don't be little the Thais by thinking that everyone will take this as being 100% truth. Thais will forget, I must ask what do you all remember about Suriyothai? Nothing much I would imagine. Just the subjective personal outtake that everyone has from the movie. And Tosakan, please don't mention the Royal Family, its just impolite and pure speculative. If you are as suave and refined as you make youself out to be, you should know better than to talk about the family in such a way. Thank you
Delete 

Page : 1 2 3 4 5
 

Privacy Policy © 2006 www.nationmultimedia.com  
44 Moo 10 Bang Na-Trat KM 4.5, Bang Na district, Bangkok 10260 Thailand
Tel 66-2-325-5555, 66-2-317-0420 and 66-2-316-5900 Fax 66-2-751-4446
Contact us: Nation Internet