The Nation

opinion

Smaller
Larger

Some background on events in 2007

Re: "Referendum needed for charter change", Letters, January 21.

Vint Chavala is right when he states that the 2007 Constitution was approved in a referendum. What he omits to state is that the military were used to help with the campaign for a Yes vote.

During the lead-up to voting, a law was passed to make any criticism of, or objections to, the proposed Constitution a criminal act.

Voters were warned that, in the event of a No vote, the military government would then have the right to impose any constitution of their choosing.

This was hardly a "free and fair" environment in which to hold such an important vote. Just imagine the outrage if the current Government sought to hold a referendum under these conditions.

By the way, following Suthep Thaugsuban's recent description of Prime Minister Yingluck as a "demon", does Vint Chavala

still maintain that the protests are being guided by a spirit of ahimsa?

Robin Grant

Bangkok


Comments conditions

Users are solely responsible for their comments.We reserve the right to remove any comment and revoke posting rights for any reason withou prior notice.