January 30, 2013 00:00 By Tan Kwoh Jack RSIS Singapor 3,556 Viewed
On December 15 2012, the prominent Lao intellectual Sombath Somphone mysteriously "disappeared". Closed-circuit video footage released by the Lao authorities showed uniformed personnel in Vientiane stopping Sombath's car before taking him away. Analysts b
Sombath’s disappearance has garnered regional and international attention in the past month: three MPs from Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines: Charles Santiago, Lily Wahid and Walden Bello made a three-day trip to Vientiane to seek some answers from the Lao government. During a press conference in Bangkok afterwards, they rebuked the Lao administration for lacking the political will to resolve the issue. Consequently, they plan to collect the signatures of MPs in every Asean country to increase pressure on the Lao government. They will also be submitting a report to the Asean Inter-governmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR).
US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton is the latest and most prominent politician to publicly comment on the issue, calling on the Lao government to pursue a “transparent investigation”, and to “do everything in its power” to obtain Sombath’s return. Besides the MPs of the three countries, other Asean members including Singapore might want to pay attention to this case.
Sombath’s wife, Ng Shui Meng, is a Singapore national. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said it is rendering consular assistance to her. Sombath shares with Singapore an active interest in strengthening sustainable development as one of Asean’s key objectives, and has made significant contributions in this area. The US-educated Sombath pioneered the use of participatory methods in poverty alleviation in Laos, and is a winner of the Ramon Magsaysay Award – commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize of Asia.
With the signing of the Asean Human Rights Charter (AHRC) in November last year, Asean members may find it increasingly difficult to remain silent on issues pertaining to human rights. These issues within Asean will start to bring into question the efficacy of the AHRC. This suggests that Asean’s long-standing principle of non-interference will have to evolve into something more expressive, if not more “interventionist”.
Lao inaction on Sombath’s case may affect the credibility of the AHRC and the AICHR. Sombath’s case is a good opportunity for Asean members to take a collective stand and further strengthen the charter. This will address the initial accusations made by non-government organisations that the charter is “not worthy of its name”.
Officials may worry that any statement that an Asean government makes in regard to human rights, will inevitably bring to the fore its own record. This is yet another reflection of the blurring of lines between the international and the domestic. For example, should a country articulate a more assertive foreign policy of human rights – under the aegis of the AHRC – it may have to take on parallel positions related to civil society and liberties within the state. At times, it may even find itself having to justify its domestic policies to Asean neighbours, as Myanmar did in recent years.
That said, Sombath’s disappearance is as much a human rights issue as one of the rule of law and due process. In recent years Singapore and Laos have ramped up bilateral economic and political relations. The air route between Singapore and Laos has re-opened, expanding tourism exponentially. Successive trade delegations have brought Singapore’s government-linked companies and private enterprises into Laos.
Laos is a popular destination for Singapore volunteers engaged in community development projects. Last year, the animal rights group Animal Concerns Research and Education Society set up a research and education centre in Laos to combat the problem of Lao bear bile products being sold in Singapore. This reflects the growing endeavour of Singaporeans to undertake community projects in developing countries.
All these point to the expanding presence of Singaporeans in Laos, and invariably, violations of the rule of law and due processes “over there” will, in one way or another begin to concern Singapore and the other Asean members. At the regional level, pressures on Asean to take a more interventionist stance on violations of human rights will also increase with the adoption of the Asean Human Rights Charter.
Tan Kwoh Jack is an associate research fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.