Legal experts query need for crime re-enactment

national June 17, 2013 00:00

By Opas Boonlom,
Patinya Iamtan,

7,774 Viewed

The police handling of the investigation into the recent murder of Akeyuth Anchanbutr has whipped up controversy and criticism. The police are not required by law to include a crime re-enactment in their investigation, but why do they, including those han



Courts are no longer allowed to accept as evidence suspects’ accounts during their re-enactment of serious crimes after laws were amended to prevent a repeat of some high-profile criminal cases in which scapegoats were convicted.
A common scene at any crime re-enactment is police “dictating” to their suspects, such as carrying out actions as a sort of wrap up by police of their investigation. For instance, during a re-enactment, if the suspect hits a “victim” on his leg, police will instruct the suspect to also hit his head, if the victim had a head injury. 
A Metropolitan Police specialist said a re-enactment is important for an investigation because each criminal or each gang behaves differently in committing a crime. Details on how criminals commit each crime help the police understand the pattern of a crime. This can help them track down other criminals showing the same behaviour pattern and help reduce the loss of life and property. 
Crime re-enactments must be kept for future investigation, he said.
Jessada Anujari, a director of the Law Society of Thailand, disapproves of the practice, especially when police dictate to the suspects. He said a re-enactment is superfluous if suspects have already confessed to a crime. 
Re-enactments are not common in foreign countries. 
How much weight is given to re-enactments at trials? 
Sri-amporn Salikup, chief justice of the Supreme Court, said a re-enactment provides an imaginative model of how the crime is committed.
For crimina l cases liable to over five years imprisonment, the court will not consider suspects’ testimony during police investigations, whether confessions or denials. A confession is not enough for conviction and police must provide evidence to prove that suspects committed a crime. If a suspect reverses his confession during a trial, then the re-enactment is meaningless, he said.
Paiboon Warahapaitoon, a member of the National Human Rights Commission, said the independent organisation had asked police to consider human rights during re-enactments because suspects are regarded as innocent until proven otherwise. 
The widely publicised murder of Thai-American teenager Sherry Ann Duncan in 1986 was an example of a miscarriage of justice. The court, under the old law, accepted confessions made during police investigations into its decision to convict four suspects.
The ill-conceived police investigation and the court’s wrongful conviction of the four men in that that case have gone down in the country’s history as a travesty of justice.

Most view