Seoul must commit to missile shield system 

opinion August 04, 2017 01:00

By The Korea Herald
Asia News Network

The way that governments have traditionally dealt with the deployment of a US missile shield system to counter threats from North Korea shows how foolhardy and senseless the leaders of this country are. 

The decision last week by the  Moon Jae-in administration in South Korea to deploy four additional interceptor launchers for the Terminal High Altitude Area Defence battery was only the latest in a series of flip-flops by Seoul. Moon took the action in response to the North’s test launch on Friday of a second intercontinental ballistic missile in 24 days. 

The decision, which paved the way for full-fledged operation of the THAAD battery of six launchers, came only 15 hours after the Moon administration had announced plans to assess the system’s environmental impact, which could take up to 15 months. 

In other words, the government made a decision that could delay the completion or even cancel deployment of the THAAD battery without considering what has become an ever-present threat from the North’s missile capabilities. That is simply ridiculous, all the more so as intelligence and media reports predicted an impending ICBM launch by the North. 

The root cause of the mix-up over the THAAD system was set in place during the Park Geun-hye administration. It should have kept it a military secret or, if it had decided to make it public, it should have thought about its impact on domestic politics, residents and its relations with China. The Park administration was not up to doing that. 

In addition, the Park administration gave in to opposition from residents of the originally designated site for the THAAD battery, and moved it to a golf course run by the Lotte Group. What we see now is that residents from the golf course area, emboldened by what their neighbours achieved, are blocking the passage of military vehicles to and from the site and Lotte has become a prime target for China’s economic retaliation. 

After Park’s impeachment, it was Moon’s turn to complicate matters further. Like other liberals Moon, then a leading presidential hopeful, initially opposed the deployment of the US missile shield. 

In order to reach out to both centrist and mild conservative voters, he endorsed the system as the election approached. He was straddling the fence, however, as he attached conditions, such as the implementation of a “legitimate” process. 

After winning the election, Moon no longer needed to please everyone. He took issue with the arrival of four launchers – two were already on the golf course under the Park administration’s decision – alleging that the Defence Ministry had kept him in the dark intentionally. The truth is that the local media had already reported their arrival. 

The “shock” Moon expressed at that time was largely seen as a move to justify his – and the liberal camp’s – hope to delay or even thwart full deployment of the THAAD battery. 

No wonder Moon’s rebuke of the Defence Ministry for its failure to report the arrival of the four launchers, along with his emphasis on “legitimate process” for stationing the THAAD battery, made the US suspicious of the Seoul government’s position. 

Then, during his visit to the US in June, Moon told Congressional leaders that South Korea would not reverse its decision to host the THAAD system. One cannot but be confused about what was on his mind. 

You could be forgiven for presuming that Moon wanted to buy time – the Friday’s announcement on a full environmental survey was one piece of evidence – and hopefully resolve the North’s nuclear and missile threats through dialogue, which could obviate the need for the THAAD system. If so, he is naive. 

The missile interception system is not the only thing that can deter the North’s rapidly growing nuclear and missile menace. But the way South Korean leaders take on the issue is a good barometer of whether they will screw up a matter that can seriously affect national security. The time has come to end this folly once and for all.

Most view