LAO AUTHORITIES say negotiations have begun over compensation for the victims of last summer’s Xe Pian-Xe Nam Noy Dam collapse, but environmental activists and rights campaigners want the dam’s backers to do more than just pay out money – they should help restore their livelihoods, too.
More than 7,000 survivors of the disastrous collapse of the hydropower dam in southern Attapeu province’s Sanamxay district have been struggling to survive for nearly seven months.
They’ve received little help from the authorities. Aid has come from overseas organisations and private donors.
Now they’ve had their first glimpse of concrete progress with the foreign investors in the controversial dam, who are finally preparing to pay them full compensation.
Washington-based Voice of America Lao (VoA Lao) last week reported that the government and investors had begun negotiating with the affected families over the amounts of compensation they’re due for damage to and destruction of houses and properties.
The investing companies are SK Engineering and Construction (SK E&C) and Korea Western Power, both based in South Korea, and Thailand’s Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding PCL (Ratch).
VoA Lao quoted Sanamxay district chief Bunhom Pommasan as saying negotiations were underway to compensate people whose vehicles were damaged.
“The list of vehicles has been prepared, so negotiations with the dam’s investors can now start in Ban Mai,” Bunhom said. “Once an agreement is reached there, they’ll move on to other affected villages one by one.”
Remedial payments for damage to homes, crops and other property will be discussed later, he said, insisting that the negotiations must proceed step by step.
Dam victims are currently receiving a monthly subsidy of 100,000 kip (Bt400), a daily allowance of 5,000 kip (Bt20) and 20 kilograms of rice per month from the government.
The dam investors last month agreed to pay US$10,000 (Bt320,000) in compensation to the next of kin of each of the 71 people officially declared dead or missing. Most of the relatives reportedly consider the amount too little.
The investors were, meanwhile, providing humanitarian aid and donating money, SK E&C said in a statement issued one month after the disaster last July. The company said it had organised an “emergency response team” to try and alleviate the impact of flooding, restore damaged infrastructure and distribute medicine, food and clothing.
SK E&C also erected temporary housing for displaced persons in the Sanamxay area at the request of provincial authorities.
Ratch said it had donated Bt5 million in disaster-relief aid to officials in Attapeu and launched multiple fundraising efforts, with the cash given directly to the victims or buying them supplies.
Neither company had responded as of publication time to The Nation’s request for an update on their plans for compensating people whose property was destroyed or damaged.
Worawan Sukraroek, a coordinator with the Thai Extraterritorial Obligations-Watch Working Group (Thai ETO-Watch), said the investors’ efforts to date were far from what was needed to help the disaster survivors regain their livelihoods.
The situation clearly showed that the investors did not respect business ethics or human rights, she said.
“They must do more than just giving the people money and moving on,” she said. “They have to provide all necessary aid by any means to help rebuild the people’s livelihoods – to at least the level they enjoyed before the disaster – and as soon as possible.
“In the longer term, the companies must develop an emergency-response plan and ensure the projects they’re investing in will have the least possible impact on people and the environment.”
Noting that the three companies are based in Thailand and South Korea, Worawan said they were obligated to adhere to the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
They have to ensure that their projects, both in their own countries and abroad, met the proper rights-protection standards, she said.
The UN Principles make corporations responsible for preventing rights violations in their operations and investments and for mitigating adverse impacts with “appropriate and timely measures”.
They also require governments to ensure that their citizens’ rights are respected and are protected from violations by private firms. They give the victims of violations the right to appropriate and prompt compensation and easy access to communication channels by which to complain to the authorities.
South Korea is also a member of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Worawan noted, which obliges multinational development firms with operations there to follow specific guidelines that set a high standard for good corporate governance.
“We hope that the other transnational companies and the Lao government will show more concern about rights protection at other investment projects,” Worawan said.
This is the fifth in a series on the fallout from last year’s dam disaster in southern Laos. Part 6, the final part, will be published next Monday.
Reporting for this story was supported by a grant from Internews’ Earth Journalism Network and Southeast Asian Press Alliance