Home > Sport > The fine line of technology and referee

  • Print
  • Email
OFF THE MARK

The fine line of technology and referee



Debate continues to rage on the ways to deal with judging errors by referees and linesmen during major football matches. Referees can change the course of the games with their decisions. Often they are ridiculed when TV replays glaringly show that they have erred in their judgement. It becomes shriller when millions of dollars are at stake on teams winning and losing.

Critics are pressuring for the use of technology the same way they do it in American football where decisions are referred to the second referee when in doubt.

Earlier this year, two technological systems, a "smart" ball with a microchip and a camerabased system developed by the Hawkeye company, were tested. But the tests were suspended by Fifa president Sepp Blatter, who is against use of technology on the grounds that its overuse would destroy passion in football. Blatter, questioning its reliability, reasoned that it is unsuitable for football.

In fact, the English Football Association had hoped to introduce the 'Hawkeye' system in 2009.

Despite Fifa's rejection of using technology, a "historic" change in football world is inevitable next season.

During an U19 match between Cyprus and the Czech Republic last month, two extra match officials (besides the four) were added to take charge behind each goal to assist with penalty area decisions.

Previous trials in Slovenia and Hungary were a great success and following more positive feedback from Cyprus, European football's governing body is likely to introduce it at the French League Cup as early as next season.

It was Uefa president Michel Platini who had the vision to propose the idea ten years ago. The idea is to provide a "human camera" for incidents that referees might miss in the penalty area.

In fact, the human camera would make more sense than an actual camera in the goal posts as the play need not be stopped. It would be a simple solution but it may change the role of the man in the middle (main referee), who, sometimes, may be confused or find it difficult to arrive at decisions.

Instead of adding two goalline judges, it may be prudent and practical to have four linesmen, one for each side of each half. They, combining with goalline technology, would spot violations more precisely and would be a great help to the referee.

Another solution is to improve the standard of referees. When players commit fouls they are shown the yellow or red cards by referees so when the man in the black shirt makes a mistake, he should be punished as well. If the mistake made by the referee is very serious he should be suspended for life.

 Does anyone remember Byron Moreno, the infamous Ecuadorian referee, who officiated during Italy's 21 secondround defeat to South Korea in the 2002 World Cup? Moreno disallowed Damiano Tomassi's golden goal and sent off Francesco Totti. Six years later Moreno has finally admitted that the Azzurri were wronged during that notorious match. He retired from refereeing in 2003, following two long suspensions in his home country.

 In the world of football these days, winning means more benefits, more trophies, and more reputation. The wrong decision of a referee can make managers lose their jobs, clubs lose their income, players lose their place in a league, and fans lose their pride.

 

 


Advertisement {literal} {/literal}

{literal} {/literal}
{literal} {/literal}



Privacy Policy (c) 2007 NMG News Co., Ltd.
1854 Bangna-Trat Road, Bangna, Bangkok 10260 Thailand.
Tel 66-2-338-3000(Call Center), 66-2-338-3333, Fax 66-2-338-3334
Contact us: Nation Internet
File attachment not accepted!